Floehopper mocha

Comments and changes to this ticket

• 

  James Mead January 1st, 2009 @ 07:30 PM

  • no changes were found...

  • rails_has_many_find.diff 2.1 KB
• 

  James Mead January 1st, 2009 @ 07:31 PM

  Date: 2008-01-02 19:53 Sender: Jonathan Leighton

  This is the output from running the test:

  
  $ ruby test/acceptance/rails_has_many_find_acceptance_test.rb 
  Loaded suite test/acceptance/rails_has_many_find_acceptance_test
  Started
  F..
  Finished in 0.032379 seconds.
  
    1) Failure:
  test_find_stubbed_on_the_association_should_work(RailsHasManyFind
  AcceptanceTest)
      [/home/turnip/Projects/mocha/test/test_runner.rb:24:in `assert_passed'
  test/acceptance/rails_has_many_find_acceptance_test.rb:29:in `test_find_stubbed_on_the_association_should_work'
  /home/turnip/Projects/mocha/lib/mocha/test_case_adapter.rb:19:in `__send__'
  /home/turnip/Projects/mocha/lib/mocha/test_case_adapter.rb:19:in `run']:
  Test failed unexpectedly with message: Error:
  test_me():
  ActiveRecord::RecordNotFound: Couldn't find Room with ID=6 AND (rooms.house_id = NULL)
     
  /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activerecord-2.0.2/lib/active_record/base.rb:1267:in `find_one'
  /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activerecord-2.0.2/lib/active_record/base.rb:1250:in `find_from_ids'   
  /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activerecord-2.0.2/lib/active_record/base.rb:504:in `find'
  /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activerecord-2.0.2/lib/active_record/associations/has_many_association.rb:66:in `find'
  test/acceptance/rails_has_many_find_acceptance_test.rb:27:in `test_me'
  /home/turnip/Projects/mocha/lib/mocha/test_case_adapter.rb:19:in `__send__'
  /home/turnip/Projects/mocha/lib/mocha/test_case_adapter.rb:19:in `run'
  /home/turnip/Projects/mocha/test/test_runner.rb:15:in `run_test'
  test/acceptance/rails_has_many_find_acceptance_test.rb:24:in `test_find_stubbed_on_the_association_should_work'
  /home/turnip/Projects/mocha/lib/mocha/test_case_adapter.rb:19:in `__send__'   
  /home/turnip/Projects/mocha/lib/mocha/test_case_adapter.rb:19:in `run'.
  
  3 tests, 1 assertions, 1 failures, 0 errors
  

  Of course ActiveRecord::Base#find should actually be called because the method is stubbed out...

• 

  James Mead January 1st, 2009 @ 07:35 PM

  Date: 2008-01-02 23:24 Sender: James Mead

  I haven't yet had a chance to run the tests you attached, but I think there have always been problems trying to stub directly on the ActiveRecord association proxies - they aren't normal objects. The simplest solution is to stub the proxy method generated by the association - in this case House#rooms to replace the proxy object itself.

  Using the recently added block initializer code in Mocha, your first test could be something like this...

  
    def test_find_stubbed_on_the_association_should_work
      test_result = run_test do
        house, room = House.new, Room.new
        rooms = stub { stubs(:find).with(6).returns(room) }
        house.stubs(:rooms).returns(rooms)
        assert_equal room, house.rooms.find(6)
      end
      assert_passed(test_result)
    end
  

  Again, I'm sorry but I haven't tested this thoroughly. Let me know if this doesn't solve your problem.

  Cheers, James.

  http://blog.floehopper.org

• 

  James Mead January 1st, 2009 @ 07:36 PM

  Date: 2008-01-02 23:38 Sender: Jonathan Leighton

  Hi James,

  Thanks for your speedy response. I figured it was probably something to do with AR's magic getting in the way. Stubbing the association proxy definitely does solve the problem (one of the tests I wrote shows this) but it would be lovely if that wasn't necessary :)

  Cheers, Jon

• 

  James Mead January 1st, 2009 @ 07:36 PM

  Date: 2008-01-03 09:23 Sender: James Mead

  Hi Jonathan,

  My response was obviously a bit too speedy - I'm afraid I'd only looked at the failing test. BTW I really appreciate you taking the time to create failing tests for the bug report - they really help communication - especially if I were to read them properly!

  Anyway, now that I understand the problem a bit better, I'll have a bit more of a think. One reason I haven't done anything about this previously is that there is a workaround which isn't too ugly and I'd like to avoid any Rails-specific code creeping into Mocha. If it's not possible to come up with a generic solution, it might be worth splitting the Mocha Rails plugin out into a separate project and adding the Rails-specific code in that.

  Cheers, James.

  http://blog.floehopper.org

• 

  James Mead January 1st, 2009 @ 07:36 PM

  Date: 2008-01-03 10:10 Sender: Jonathan Leighton

  Hi James,

  No problem, thanks for taking the time to look at it.

  Jon