after mocha update from 0.9.5 to 0.9.6 unit tests fails to execute
Reported by iwakura-taro | June 30th, 2009 @ 05:36 PM
Unit tests fails
/usr/local/bin/ruby18 -I"lib:test" "/home/taro/gems/gems/rake-0.8.7/lib/rake/rake_test_loader.rb" "test/unit/helpers/items_helper_test.rb" "test/unit/helpers/users_helper_test.rb" "t
est/unit/helpers/user_sessions_helper_test.rb" "test/unit/helpers/comments_helper_test.rb" "test/unit/helpers/checklist_templates_helper_test.rb" "test/unit/helpers/checklists_helper
_test.rb" "test/unit/helpers/companies_helper_test.rb" "test/unit/item_test.rb" "test/unit/user_test.rb" "test/unit/asset_test.rb" "test/unit/comment_test.rb" "test/unit/checklist_te
mplate_test.rb" "test/unit/company_test.rb" "test/unit/checklist_test.rb"
/home/taro/gems/gems/activesupport-2.3.2/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:105:in `const_missing': uninitialized constant Test::Unit::TestResult::TestResultFailureSupport (NameError
)
from /home/taro/gems/gems/test-unit-2.0.2/lib/test/unit/testresult.rb:28
from /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom_require.rb:31:in `gem_original_require'
from /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom_require.rb:31:in `require'
from /home/taro/gems/gems/activesupport-2.3.2/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:158:in `require'
from /home/taro/gems/gems/test-unit-2.0.2/lib/test/unit/ui/testrunnermediator.rb:9
from /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom_require.rb:31:in `gem_original_require'
from /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom_require.rb:31:in `require'
from /home/taro/gems/gems/activesupport-2.3.2/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:158:in `require'
from /home/taro/gems/gems/test-unit-2.0.2/lib/test/unit/ui/console/testrunner.rb:9
from /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom_require.rb:31:in `gem_original_require'
from /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom_require.rb:31:in `require'
from /home/taro/gems/gems/activesupport-2.3.2/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:158:in `require'
from /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8/test/unit/autorunner.rb:25
from /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8/test/unit/autorunner.rb:214:in `[]'
from /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8/test/unit/autorunner.rb:214:in `run'
from /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8/test/unit/autorunner.rb:12:in `run'
from /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8/test/unit.rb:278
from /home/taro/gems/gems/rake-0.8.7/lib/rake/rake_test_loader.rb:5
Comments and changes to this ticket
-
James Mead June 30th, 2009 @ 05:46 PM
- Tag set to bug-report
Thanks for reporting the problem. I'd be really grateful if you could supply us with a bit more information :-
What version of Ruby are you using?
What version of the test-unit gem are you using?
Are you running this in a Rails project using "rake test:units"? If yes, what version of Rails?
Does it work if you uninstall the test-unit gem? Or are you relying on functionality provided in the test-unit gem?
Also does it fail if you run a single unit test using Ruby not Rake? e.g. "ruby test/unit/user_test.rb"? Do all unit tests fail the same way?
Thanks, James.
-
James Mead June 30th, 2009 @ 06:03 PM
I have reproduced the problem with Ruby 1.8.6, Rails 2.3.2 and test-unit gem 2.0.2.
The main problem seems to be that the test-unit gem is not being loaded before Mocha.
A simple fix seems to be to add a line to test/test_helper.rb as follows :-
ENV["RAILS_ENV"] = "test" require File.expand_path(File.dirname(__FILE__) + "/../config/environment") gem 'test-unit' # <= add this line require 'test_help'
Please let me know if this fixes your problem.
Cheers, James.
-
James Mead June 30th, 2009 @ 10:15 PM
Hmm. That's strange. I wonder if there is a difference between versions of RubyGems. What version do you have? I have 1.3.1.
You could try :-
require 'test/unit'
instead of my previous suggestion of :-
gem 'test-unit'
In test/test_helper.rb.
Please let me know if this helps.
Cheers, James.
-
James Mead July 1st, 2009 @ 09:21 AM
- State changed from new to open
Thanks for the extra information.
I think the important thing is for me to understand exactly how and when Mocha is being loaded.
I'm attaching a patched version of the 0.9.6 mocha gem which prints out some diagnostic data.
I'd really appreciate it if you could download the mocha-debug-0.9.6.gem file and install it :-
sudo gem install $DOWNLOAD_PATH/mocha-debug-0.9.6.gem
Note that you will need to replace $DOWNLOAD_PATH with the path to the downloaded file.
Then if you run your tests and send me the output - that would be great.
I'd expect to see a "stack trace" which will tell me what is requiring Mocha. I would also expect to see a message explaining what Mocha modules are being included into Test::Unit::TestCase.
Thanks.
-
James Mead July 1st, 2009 @ 12:17 PM
It looks like Mocha is being loaded when the thoughtbot-shoulda gem is loaded. This is in turn loading activesupport/testcase.rb which is loading the mocha gem.
I have reproduced the error [Note 1] in your latest trace by putting creating an empty Rails project and adding the following to config/environment.rb :-
config.gem 'thoughtbot-shoulda', :version => '2.10.1', :lib => 'shoulda'
And installing the test-unit gem version 2.0.2.
Then running rake test:functionals gives me the error.
However, note that this is a different error than the one you originally reported [Note 2].
If you don't need Mocha for your own tests, can you try uninstalling the Mocha gem. This works for me.
If you do need Mocha for your own tests, but you don't need the test-unit gem, can you try uninstalling the test-unit gem. This works for me.
If you do need Mocha and you do need the test-unit gem, can you try adding a line in config/environment.rb just before the shoulda gem is required :-
gem 'test-unit' config.gem 'thoughtbot-shoulda', :version => '2.10.1', :lib => 'shoulda'
This fixes the problem for me.
Let me know if any of these solutions work for you.
BTW - it might be more sensible to require the shoulda in config/environments/test.rb, because I you probably only want it loaded in the test environment.
Cheers, James.
[Note 1] uninitialized constant Test::Unit::TestCase::DESCENDANTS (NameError) in gems/test-unit-2.0.2/lib/test/unit/collector/descendant.rb:14
[Note 2] uninitialized constant Test::Unit::TestResult::TestResultFailureSupport (NameError) in gems/test-unit-2.0.2/lib/test/unit/testresult.rb:28
-
James Mead July 1st, 2009 @ 04:56 PM
- State changed from open to resolved
-
James Adam May 31st, 2010 @ 10:26 PM
I have hit this issue outwith any Rails context. With both Ruby 1.8.7 and 1.9.1, if you install the test-unit gem (2.0.7) and mocha (0.9.8), and then run the following script, the exception will be raised:
require 'rubygems' require 'test/unit' require 'mocha'
I believe this is happening because
test/unit
is being loaded from the ruby standard library. Then, whenmocha
loads, it detects thattest/unit
is present (viaMocha::Integration.test_unit_testcase_defined?
), but then tries to detect the version (seemocha/integration/test_unit.rb
) by callingrequire "test/unit/version"
.Because this file doesn't exist in the standard library, I believe Rubygems is then allowing
require
to start searching within gems, finally finding the file in thetest-unit
gem. This then causes some of the gem to load, despite other parts ofTest::Unit
already being loaded from the standard library.In my particular case, I have the gem present for another project, but don't want to make it a requirement of my current project, so we're a bit stuck.
I can't think of a good solution for this. Some ideas:
- trying to detect which version of
test/unit
is loaded in some way other than requiring any files (and thus triggering Rubygems' overly-helpful behaviour) - side-stepping the issue by using Bundler to 'isolate' the available gems in my project
Anyway, I thought it might be useful to write this out, if only for further thought.
- trying to detect which version of
-
James Mead June 1st, 2010 @ 08:12 AM
Hi James,
That's really helpful - thanks.
It might be worth trying the same experiment with Mocha built from HEAD. I suspect it won't actually fix the problem, but I've added more debug information and I've provides integration monkey-patches for more recent versions of e.g. test-unit.
It sounds like it might be worth trying your first suggested solution i.e. detecting test-unit version without requiring files.
Cheers, James.
-
James Mead June 1st, 2010 @ 08:13 AM
- State changed from resolved to open
-
James Mead June 5th, 2010 @ 05:46 PM
I've pushed up an attempted fix for this [1]. Is there any chance you could try it out?
I'm not 100% convinced it's a sensible solution, but it seems to do the job. I have a slight concern it may have undesirable side effects.
[1] http://github.com/floehopper/mocha/commit/22599b8bbc99f72b8c33f76df...
-
James Mead November 26th, 2010 @ 11:12 AM
- State changed from open to resolved
- Milestone order changed from 0 to 0
This was fixed in Mocha 0.9.9 :-
$ ruby -v ruby 1.8.7 (2010-04-19 patchlevel 253) [i686-darwin10.4.0], MBARI 0x6770, Ruby Enterprise Edition 2010.02 $ rvm gemset use mochabug Now using gemset 'mochabug' $ gem install test-unit -v2.0.7 Successfully installed test-unit-2.0.7 1 gem installed $ gem install mocha -v0.9.8 Successfully installed mocha-0.9.8 1 gem installed $ cat bug.rb require 'rubygems' require 'test/unit' require 'mocha' $ ruby bug.rb /Users/jamesmead/.rvm/gems/ree-1.8.7-2010.02@mochabug/gems/test-unit-2.0.7/lib/test/unit/testresult.rb:28: uninitialized constant Test::Unit::TestResult::TestResultFailureSupport (NameError) from /Users/jamesmead/.rvm/rubies/ree-1.8.7-2010.02/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom_require.rb:31:in `gem_original_require' from /Users/jamesmead/.rvm/rubies/ree-1.8.7-2010.02/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom_require.rb:31:in `require' from /Users/jamesmead/.rvm/gems/ree-1.8.7-2010.02@mochabug/gems/test-unit-2.0.7/lib/test/unit/ui/testrunnermediator.rb:9 from /Users/jamesmead/.rvm/rubies/ree-1.8.7-2010.02/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom_require.rb:31:in `gem_original_require' from /Users/jamesmead/.rvm/rubies/ree-1.8.7-2010.02/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom_require.rb:31:in `require' from /Users/jamesmead/.rvm/gems/ree-1.8.7-2010.02@mochabug/gems/test-unit-2.0.7/lib/test/unit/ui/console/testrunner.rb:11 from /Users/jamesmead/.rvm/rubies/ree-1.8.7-2010.02/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom_require.rb:31:in `gem_original_require' from /Users/jamesmead/.rvm/rubies/ree-1.8.7-2010.02/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom_require.rb:31:in `require' from /Users/jamesmead/.rvm/rubies/ree-1.8.7-2010.02/lib/ruby/1.8/test/unit/autorunner.rb:25 from /Users/jamesmead/.rvm/rubies/ree-1.8.7-2010.02/lib/ruby/1.8/test/unit/autorunner.rb:214:in `[]' from /Users/jamesmead/.rvm/rubies/ree-1.8.7-2010.02/lib/ruby/1.8/test/unit/autorunner.rb:214:in `run' from /Users/jamesmead/.rvm/rubies/ree-1.8.7-2010.02/lib/ruby/1.8/test/unit/autorunner.rb:12:in `run' from /Users/jamesmead/.rvm/rubies/ree-1.8.7-2010.02/lib/ruby/1.8/test/unit.rb:279 $ gem uninstall mocha -v0.9.8 Successfully uninstalled mocha-0.9.8 $ gem install mocha -v0.9.9 Successfully installed mocha-0.9.9 1 gem installed $ ruby bug.rb Loaded suite bug Started Finished in 0.000143 seconds. 0 tests, 0 assertions, 0 failures, 0 errors
I've also tried the same test in Ruby 1.9.2.
I'm closing this ticket. Thanks.
-
James Mead March 4th, 2013 @ 12:56 PM
Note that the fix mentioned above has been reverted [1] in the latest Mocha.
We believe the problem can be averted by adding a
gem "test-unit"
statement beforerequire "test/unit"
.
Please Sign in or create a free account to add a new ticket.
With your very own profile, you can contribute to projects, track your activity, watch tickets, receive and update tickets through your email and much more.
Create your profile
Help contribute to this project by taking a few moments to create your personal profile. Create your profile ยป
A mocking & stubbing library for Ruby.
* <a href="http://github.com/floehopper/mocha">GitHub repository</a>
* <a href="http://mocha.rubyforge.org">Documentation</a>
* <a href="http://groups.google.com/group/mocha-developer">Mailing List</a>
People watching this ticket
Attachments
Tags
Referenced by
- 64 Investigate RunCodeRun build failures RunCodeRun has ceased to exist and I suspect these errors...
- 60 Test failure with test-unit v2.0.6 I'm pretty sure this is a duplicate of this ticket which...